Steelman
argue-a-position-in-frame Β· performance
Aim
Learn to choose a legal doctrine and argue a case within it, while fact-checking AI's claims rather than trusting them blindly, to produce a tribunal verdict you can defend on grounds of law, not sympathy.
In one line
Argue the strongest case β then fact-check the AI that helped you build it.
Stage run
| # | Stage | Type | Aim | Min |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | The Docket | arcade | Students seat themselves as the bench on the real Garcia v. Character Technologies wrongful-death docket, read the unsoftened facts of record, and commit a locked liability verdict on a single legal doctrine before the real court disposition is revealed against their stance. | |
| 2 | Ethics Tribunal | dossier | ||
| 3 | Verify, Donβt Trust | workbench | Learn to steelman, fact-check and rebut AI reasoning, to defend a position you can actually stand behind, in the context of a tribunal where the strongest in-frame argument wins. | |
| 4 | Tribunal Verdict | larp | When a chatbot is named in a child's death, who is liable β and can you prove it in three minutes to a room that wants you to lose? | 70 |
Evidence artefact
Tribunal Verdict β judged on rigor-in-frame, not who is right