Discernment
Stress-test a source AND the AI through your questions, then judge what survives.
Challenge
- Challenge 01
Run your three questions at both a source and at Claude. Mark each answer keeps / refine / reject. Flag any specific (name, date, number, citation) you could not verify independently.
- Challenge 02
Pick the single most confident answer that turned out unverifiable and say which AI limit produced it β hallucination, knowledge cutoff, or no tool access.
- Challenge 03
You ask an AI: "What are the top three reasons the printing press changed Europe?" The AI lists three reasons with confident language. Now ask a historian the same question and compare. Which reasons does the AI omit? Which does the historian emphasize differently? Which survive both?
- Challenge 04
An AI generates five claims about how a company operates. Pick the one that sounds most like inside knowledge (specific, confident, detailed). Try to verify it. If you can't, ask: Is the AI drawing on public data that happens to be detailed? Or is it inventing plausibility? Write one question you'd ask the AI to expose which it is.
- Challenge 05
An AI explains a technical concept (how transistors work, why plants need sunlight). Write three follow-up questions designed to expose the limits of its explanation. Then ask the AI those questions. For each answer, decide: Did it hold up, or did it hedge, contradict itself, or admit it doesn't know?
- Challenge 06
A source (article, report, interview) makes an argument. Ask the AI to play the strongest counterargument to that source. Then ask: Which side's argument survives your stress-test better? What evidence is each side missing? Where are they both wrong?
- Challenge 07
Ask an AI for a number (a statistic, a percentage, a cost). Then ask: "Where does that number come from?" If it cites a source, check if the source actually contains it. If it can't cite the source, ask: "Are you confident enough to stake your reputation on that number?" Note what survives: the number itself or only the caveat.
- Challenge 08
Compare how a source and Claude answer the same open-ended question (e.g., "What's the biggest challenge in education?" or "Why do people procrastinate?"). Map what each one includes, leaves out, and assumes. Then decide: What's the core insight that both touch? What would you need to believe to accept each one? What survives cross-checking?