Manipulate prompts for audience, style, and tone to argue through each lens.

Challenge

1. Challenge 01

   Take the case through two of the six lenses (rights, justice, utility, common good, virtue, care). For each, prompt Claude with a defined audience, tone, and role — and compare how the framing shifts the argument.

2. Challenge 02

   Pick a controversial AI regulation. Write two prompts that argue the same position—one to a policymaker (formal, cost-benefit), one to a 16-year-old online (direct, concrete harms). Run both through Claude. Which framing was more persuasive for each audience? Why?

3. Challenge 03

   Take a real news story about AI bias (hiring, lending, content moderation). Write one prompt asking Claude to argue from the rights lens, then one from the utility lens, both on the same facts. Document where the arguments diverge and why the lens drove the difference.

4. Challenge 04

   Write a prompt asking Claude to explain generative AI to three different audiences: a school board, a tech investor, and a teenager who's never used AI. Use tone shifts (formal → plain → excited) and different examples for each. Test them. Which audience interpretation was hardest to nail?

5. Challenge 05

   Frame the same content request in two opposite tones: one as a neutral observer, one as someone who strongly opposes the technology. Prompt Claude with each. Compare the evidence they cite, the counterarguments they acknowledge, and the confidence level. Did tone change the facts?

6. Challenge 06

   Pick a captious question (e.g., 'Is AI stealing art?'). Reframe it through the justice lens, then the virtue lens. Write a prompt for each frame that asks Claude to argue the strongest version of that lens's position. Which lens generates a more compelling case for your audience?

7. Challenge 07

   Write a prompt to Claude explaining a single AI risk to three roles: a data scientist, a lawyer, and a parent. Include role-specific context and language in each prompt. Run all three. Did the role shift which risks Claude emphasized, or only how they were explained?

8. Challenge 08

   Take a claim about AI (e.g., 'models learn shortcuts'). Write one prompt that assumes the reader is skeptical, one that assumes the reader is an advocate. Use different tone, evidence, and concessions in each. Test both. Did the prompt's tone change Claude's answer, or only its style?